|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmx de> wrote:
> Recent tests we made with the 3.6 beta showed that the best performance
> with gcc is achieved with plain '-O3' and without additional '-f...'
That makes lots of sense.
If there's some optimization which is not turned on with -O3 (which
is the maximum -O flag) there's probably a reason. If there would be
some additional optimization which would increase the performance
of the code, wouldn't they include it in -O3?
I suppose those optimizations not included are experimental, theoretical
(ie. they *may* speed up, but also slow down) or just buggy.
--
#macro M(A,N,D,L)plane{-z,-9pigment{mandel L*9translate N color_map{[0rgb x]
[1rgb 9]}scale<D,D*3D>*1e3}rotate y*A*8}#end M(-3<1.206434.28623>70,7)M(
-1<.7438.1795>1,20)M(1<.77595.13699>30,20)M(3<.75923.07145>80,99)// - Warp -
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |