|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Tim Nikias v2.0 wrote:
> Well, one call vs 3500 is a better quota...
> (I could even use 20, it's *still* better than 3500)
3500 is the number of "hops" for one particle in one frame? Or...?
So you want to reduce it to 1 or 20 when a particle slides along a
surface - which are the cases then where you actually DO want the 3500
samples being taken? I mean - why do your system take that small time
steps sometimes when it seems you're saying that you don't need that
precise calculations anyway?
Rune
--
3D images and anims, include files, tutorials and more:
rune|vision: http://runevision.com **updated Jan 29**
POV-Ray Ring: http://webring.povray.co.uk
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |