"Pablo Viojo" <arr### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:403588bf@news.povray.org...
>

<snip>

My comments and suggestions....

I don't like the idea of different curators votes being given different
weights - you, as musuem owner, would reserve right of veto, but weighting votes
beyond that strikes me as both messy and divisive.

It wouldn't really matter if only a sub-set of the curators voted on each
image - just set an appropriate threshold of votes required before any image is
made available to the museum in general (assuming that the average vote was high
enough to warrant the image's inclusion).

As a minor suggestion to keep some sort of equilibrium between harsh and
generous curators, it might be worth applying some sort of function to a vote
that would help balance things out - in other words a high vote from someone who
rarely gave high votes would be worth more that a high vote from someone who
consistently gave generous votes (and visa-versa for low votes).

Post a reply to this message