Ken wrote:
> 
> Gilles Tran wrote:
> 

>>news:5pp### [at] tritonimagicode...
>>
>>
>>>I think a common group for all 3rd party tools would be a good idea
>>>(povray.tools or povray.utilities).   This way it would be easier to
>>>adapt to tools becoming more popular and others less.
>>
>>povray.tools + the prefix gets my vote.
>>
>>There's a lot of intersection between these tools (Poser + Poseray for
>>instance) so keeping them all at the same place is a good idea.
> 
> 
> From a consistent hierarchy point of view I would think that povray.text.utilities
> would be a better fit. I have often thought it inconsistent that we had the
> povray.utilities.binaries group without the .text group for related discussions.
> 
Is that what it's supposed to mean?  I never did understand the 
text/binaries designation.

And what are p.b.tutorials and p.t.tutorials intended to be used for?

Post a reply to this message