> I should also note that, if your objects are at somewhere like:
> Spline(0),Spline(1),Spline(2),...etc Jim's code will work a treat as each
> object should point exactly at the next. If they are less evenly
> distributed, then you'll have to use something like mine which just points
> along the curve, rather than at the next object.
> 
Yes, that is what I had in mind.  I guess what I usually do

is Loop to total

	spline ( count / total ) - spline ( (count - 1)/total )
	
    increment count

Post a reply to this message