Lutz-Peter Hooge wrote:
> Gilles Tran <tra### [at] inapginrafr> wrote:
> 
> 
>>I don't think it's better, but it's certainly more mainstream
> 
> 
> Sure? I think java is more commonly installed than Quicktime, but I may 
> be wrong. Also PTViewer IMHO gives better quality (panning is more evenly
> and less flickering pixels).
> btw, an example POV-panorama in PTviewer: 
> <http://lutz-peter.hoogi.de/extern/pano_medium.html>
And how looks the camera definition in POV?
Wijnand
> 
>>I like the idea of having standalone files that I (and the user) can play
>>outside the webpage. 
> 
> 
> There is a version of PTviewer that will also run as a standalone application.
> In Windows you can also add an association "open with ptviewer" to jpeg files
> so you can open them in PTviewer directly. 
> (something like C:\WINDOWS\javaw.exe -jar "D:\ptviewer.jar" "%1")
> 
> Lutz-Peter

Post a reply to this message