I never really intended it to have a monolithic quality, but you have a point.
I'll try it in a more prominent position. I put it to one side to make a more
interesting large-scale picture, so different bits of the image show different
details.

The clouds... well I like them but that's mostly a technical thing (since
they're just 2D), but I have seen better so I may play with Gilles' makecloud
macros.

The point where the fractal meets the water has become much more significant as
I've moved the camera futher back. The darkness of it's reflection makes the
water appear very transparent, which is why I'm thinking of putting some fish in
there. Probably subtle orange/yellow fish to balance against the other colours
in the scene.

Thanks for your suggestions :)

--
Tek
http://www.evilsuperbrain.com

"Shay" <sah### [at] simcopartscom> wrote in message news:3ef9ec89@news.povray.org...
>
> "Tek" <tek### [at] evilsuperbraincom> wrote in message
> news:3ef9e8a9@news.povray.org...
>
> I like the mountains. I like the seagull. I hate that you have the
> fractal stuck off to one side of the picture. It loses it's monolithic
> quality when positioned that way. The sky looks cheesy to me too, but
> perhaps it's just that too much of it is showing for my tastes. The
> strongest point of interest for me is where the fractal meets the water.
>
>  -Shay
>
>
>

Post a reply to this message