>   I don't agree.
>   There are many things which are most beautiful when they are completely
> physically correctly modelled (fakes and shortcuts usually make them look
> less pretty). For example water, fire, cloths, objects colliding with each
> other, etc etc.
>   For example a slow-motion animation of a rock thrown into a pool of
> water is the most beautiful when its modelling is physically perfect.
>

you won :-)
it is a scientific reproduction of nature, which is for me pure art
but i didn't mean it really in that way, i had something in mind like
'artistic freedom'.
lenx

Post a reply to this message