Lenx <len### [at] pandorabe> wrote:
> it is true what you say, but imo if art was scientific correct it wasn't
> called art anymore.

  I don't agree.
  There are many things which are most beautiful when they are completely
physically correctly modelled (fakes and shortcuts usually make them look
less pretty). For example water, fire, cloths, objects colliding with each
other, etc etc.
  For example a slow-motion animation of a rock thrown into a pool of
water is the most beautiful when its modelling is physically perfect.

-- 
#macro M(A,N,D,L)plane{-z,-9pigment{mandel L*9translate N color_map{[0rgb x]
[1rgb 9]}scale<D,D*3D>*1e3}rotate y*A*8}#end M(-3<1.206434.28623>70,7)M(
-1<.7438.1795>1,20)M(1<.77595.13699>30,20)M(3<.75923.07145>80,99)// - Warp -

Post a reply to this message