Xplo Eristotle <xpl### [at] infomagicnet> wrote:
> If you can't be bothered to try to help, then DON'T REPLY.

  Do you really think you will get wholehearted help with that attitude?

> The rest of you ought to be ashamed of yourselves.

  Why?
  When I ask you to post a short, minimized and clean scene which shows
the phenomenon you are talking about, and then I explain myself what I
mean by minimal, you start insulting me.
  You still refuse to understand (or admit you understand) what I'm talking
about, but instead you keep making more or less direct insinuations about
me being stupid.
  I said that if you want help from people, it's good and polite to see
some trouble in making it the easiest possible for the people to study
your code and not expect people editing and understanding your code.
I also said that if you want help from people, you shouldn't start
depreciating their intelligence and insulting them. Your response to this
is basically "if you don't want to do it, fuck off".
  And lastly, when I show you how I think the code is at its minimum and
most clear shape, you don't even bother to comment it, why it's good/bad
and whether I, in your opinion, am right or wrong about it. (Instead you
start attacking me.)

  So why is it me who should be ashamed of myself?
  It wasn't me who started insulting and name-calling.

-- 
#macro M(A,N,D,L)plane{-z,-9pigment{mandel L*9translate N color_map{[0rgb x]
[1rgb 9]}scale<D,D*3D>*1e3}rotate y*A*8}#end M(-3<1.206434.28623>70,7)M(
-1<.7438.1795>1,20)M(1<.77595.13699>30,20)M(3<.75923.07145>80,99)// - Warp -

Post a reply to this message