Vadim Sytnikov wrote:

> "ABX" <abx### [at] abxartpl> wrote:
>> Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde> wrote:
>> > It looks interesting but i have some doubts whether these numbers are
>> > representative.  My own tests some time ago showed that the MinGW
> version
>> > is significantly faster than the Borland C++ version.  What were the
>> > optimizations used for GCC?
>>
>> <...>
>> MINGW & DJGPP:
>>   CFLAGS= -march=pentiumpro -O3 -pedantic
>> <...>
> 
> From this list, at least one quite important thing is
> missing: -fomit-frame-pointer. There are a few other things to tweak, but
> the impact of not generating EBP-based stack frames outweighs all the
> rest.

I'm missing the -ffast-math flag which should have quite some impact as 
well.

-- 
POV-Ray Objects Collection: http://objects.povworld.org

Post a reply to this message