"ABX" <abx### [at] abxartpl> wrote:
> Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde> wrote:
> > It looks interesting but i have some doubts whether these numbers are
> > representative.  My own tests some time ago showed that the MinGW
version
> > is significantly faster than the Borland C++ version.  What were the
> > optimizations used for GCC?
>
> <...>
> MINGW & DJGPP:
>   CFLAGS= -march=pentiumpro -O3 -pedantic
> <...>

From this list, at least one quite important thing is
missing: -fomit-frame-pointer. There are a few other things to tweak, but
the impact of not generating EBP-based stack frames outweighs all the rest.

Post a reply to this message