"Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message
news:3e58e425@news.povray.org...
> Will W <wil### [at] nospamwizzardsnet> wrote:
> > Organizing functions by return type is, for me, an intriguing idea.
>
>   There's a very good reason for this in programming, as I explained
> previously.

Yes, I see that. You are preaching to the choir.

I do not see any compelling reason for changing the way the POV and its
documentation are organized. As I have said elsewhere, I do think a brief
appendix for experienced programmers who are new to POV could be very useful
in cutting down aggravation and stupid sounding questions. But that would be
an added feature, not a change in what has already been done. It would be
something nice to have, but not strictly necessary.


--
Will Woodhull
Thornhenge, SW Oregon, USA
willl.at.thornhenge.net

Post a reply to this message