To add to that. If you animated the blocks moving slowly up and down in
random or perhaps with a factal patern it would be great as a background of
a video title. It would eat up a lot of bandwidth to use it animated on a
webpage but it would look good animated there as well.


"Mike Williams" <mic### [at] quixnetnet> wrote in message
news:3e2f3306@news.povray.org...
> The fact that you see somthing in it makes it an abstract. If the artist
> intended you to see something in it. If the artist created it just for the
> look that was created then it is call non-objective art.
>
> I thank it is a very good non-objective piece and it looks like it could
be
> great for the background of a webpage or titleing of a video.
>
> As for getting around to real scenes I would say this is better than some
of
> the "real" scenes I have seen. A grood graphic artist has to learn how to
> make simple shapes look great. you did just that. Good job.
>
> "Marc Jacquier" <jac### [at] wanadoofr> wrote in message
> news:3e2ef974@news.povray.org...
> > I see sugar blocs with coffea
> > MArc

> > isdt2v8moshl8o5g0frrakmrcq6bl3359d@4ax.com...
> > > On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 15:15:19 -0000, "Andrew Cocker"
> > <mai### [at] andrewcockercouk>
> > > wrote:
> > > > minimal abstract stuff
> > >
> > > I don't think it is completly abstract. This can be city viewed from
> plane
> > > through hole in clouds :-)
> > >
> > > ABX
> >
> >
>
>

Post a reply to this message