In article <3e1acbf1$1@news.povray.org> , "Mael" <mae### [at] hotmailcom> 
wrote:

>> http://195.221.122.126/samples/erreur.html
>
> Updated with curves for a 300 points set by Christoph Hormann, and also added
> curves for the max error
>
> The scene rendered for 50 samples for the three distributions
> http://195.221.122.126/samples/erreur_images.html
> this is low quality radiosity :
> 1 pass (about 1000 points where illuminance is gathered), high error_bound
> (but the aim was to evaluate the quality of the gathering part, not the whole
> radiosity algorithm :)

Pardon my ignorance, but I see no real difference in any of the
pictures...???

    Thorsten

____________________________________________________
Thorsten Froehlich, Duisburg, Germany
e-mail: tho### [at] trfde

Visit POV-Ray on the web: http://mac.povray.org

Post a reply to this message