|
|
As Sir Charles said, costs.
A large company can afford to prolong a patent case well beyond the means of a
single individual or small company. Even a clear and obvious patent infringement
cannot be defended without a suitable legal team.
Hoover ripped off Dyson and the fight went on for years - now Dyson were by then
a large enough company to last the distance, but as an example of a simple and
obvious infringement turning into a protracted series of legal challenges it's
very depressing.
"Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message news:3dd0fadc@news.povray.org...
> Dr Engelbert Buxbaum <eng### [at] webde> wrote:
> > You have to be able to defend them in the legal system,
> > and that is virtually impossible for a small inventor.
>
> Can you explain why?
>
> --
> #macro N(D)#if(D>99)cylinder{M()#local D=div(D,104);M().5,2pigment{rgb M()}}
> N(D)#end#end#macro M()<mod(D,13)-6mod(div(D,13)8)-3,10>#end blob{
> N(11117333955)N(4254934330)N(3900569407)N(7382340)N(3358)N(970)}// - Warp -
Post a reply to this message
|
|