|
|
Well when I read comments on my entries I'm looking mostly for some measure
of how much people liked the image, and suggestions on how to improve it. I
think the latter is very important, because it would be frustrating for my
image to not do very well but not have any constructive criticisms.
I try to write comments that have suggested improvements to the image.
Though I do worry that sometimes my comments must seem very negative.
"Jim Charter" <jrc### [at] aolcom> wrote in message
news:3DC### [at] aolcom...
> I have finished ascribing marks to the lastest round of stills, acting
> for the first time in the role of "panel judge". I think there are some
> very impressive entries and I am enjoying the process very much. But I
> feel a little queasy when it comes to making comments. There has been
> some discussion in the past which suggests the importance of comments,
> but I suddenly find that I am questioning what the assumed purpose of
> the comments might be. I find I try and indicate to the artist how I
> respond to the image, and what higher meaning I might glean from it.
> But then I grow embarrassed and opt for the obigatory superlatives. Is
> there an agreed apon purpose for the comments?
> -Jim ( jrc### [at] aolcom )
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|