|
|
Doctor John <jgu### [at] netscapenet> wrote in message
news:web.3dc91c75b02902dfb29393de0@news.povray.org...
> >>
> BTW Forgot to add.. Your entry is brilliant. (Still trying to decide if
it's
> on or off topic, tho')
>
Thanks, I've been struggling with that for every entry in the round. Not
whether or not the image is on topic (I believe they all are), but how to
distinguish between an entire round of almost all very very similar topics.
I am looking a lot at how specific the concepts are, whether the person had
a strong, clear idea of how he wanted his landscape to look, or just played
around until he got an attractive looking height-field. There are a lot of
concepts in this round which are *very* strong in that respect.
There were a few other artificial landscape concepts mentioned at the
beginning of the round. I am disappointed that none of them made it.
-Shay
Post a reply to this message
|
|