"hughes b" <omn### [at] charternet> wrote in message news:3d33c5bc$1@news.povray.org...
>
> [snip]
>
> Now, about that sor thing. Gee... well, I sure thought that had been fixed
> up in the Doc long ago. Maybe it had been and was redone wrong again. I
> believe the keyword open should be there. If I had a previous version handy
> I'd take a look, but I don't just now.

I think the missing open keyword in that docu. example goes back to version 2.2, if my
memory serves.  As most everyone was
concentrating on new features during beta testing, I can see how this would slip
through again.

--
Robert Chaffe
http://www.donovansweb.com/~chaffe/

Post a reply to this message