Thorsten Froehlich <tho### [at] trfde> wrote:
> They are, as in many other case, over-interpreting the HTML 4 "Standard".
> So, again the holly and unfailable master teachers of proper web design in
> the Mozilla development group force the specification on the user no matter
> what the cost.  Hence the obvious is not to use intentionally broken
> browsers like Mozilla!

  I don't understand. If Mozilla sticks to the standard, how is it "broken"?

  Besides, it makes sense. A link starts with the <a> tag and ends with
the </a> tag. Leaving the </a> tag out is a syntax error. What should the
browser do in this case? The most correct behaviour would be, of course, to
issue an error message and refuse to show the page at all. Of course they
want to be a bit more user-friendly than that.
  If a page has a syntax error, who defines which is the correct behaviour?
Microsoft?

-- 
#macro M(A,N,D,L)plane{-z,-9pigment{mandel L*9translate N color_map{[0rgb x]
[1rgb 9]}scale<D,D*3D>*1e3}rotate y*A*8}#end M(-3<1.206434.28623>70,7)M(
-1<.7438.1795>1,20)M(1<.77595.13699>30,20)M(3<.75923.07145>80,99)// - Warp -

Post a reply to this message