In article <3D300481.7C6026A1@gmx.de> , Christoph Hormann 
<chr### [at] gmxde>  wrote:

> You are probably right although i have the impression that the authors of
> those very good articles about 3.0 and 3.1 are no more working there, at
> least all recent things about POV-Ray did not give the impression of that
> much competence (although maybe it's just me knowing more about POV-Ray
> now).

Well, compare it with this even worse information in the news section of
macwelt.de (a big German version of the Macworld magazine).  At least I am
wondering when I introduced simultaneous rendering of multiple scenes...
<http://www.macwelt.de/_news/200207/id13119.shtml>

>> Or maybe they just got those articles from independent authors like thy got
>> all the interesting radiosity (issue 6/91) and procedural textures (issue
>> 1/93).  In general they still seem to publish independent articles.  Maybe
>> you would want try to write something about isosurfaces or other new 3.5
>> features...?
>
> At least i will mail the author about the mistakes in the text.

They changed it a bit now.  Not much better, but at least now using a kind
of German word for isosurface, so one can only complain about the miserable
translation now ;-(

    Thorsten

____________________________________________________
Thorsten Froehlich, Duisburg, Germany
e-mail: tho### [at] trfde

Visit POV-Ray on the web: http://mac.povray.org

Post a reply to this message