|
 |
Restating,
While using MegaPov 0.7 I ran into an undesirable (IMHO and yet unbuggy)
aspect of using image_maps, an aspect most likely in existence as far back
as 3.02. I asked if there were a way around this and someone suggested the
object pattern. (an off-topic suggestion???) It was a very useful idea, but
the suggestion did not (IIRC) contain the proper syntax for 0.7. So I
suppose the topicality-hawks would have me stop the thread right there and
move it to p.u.p., but I think that's quite absurd. I have respect for
the topicality of p.g. such that I would never ask, for example, about
0.7's proximity pattern here, but contempt for topicality if the above
scenario is against server policy........
news:om3ehug5fcmv929mar0ql8foialdpp5ud7@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2002 08:18:06 -0400, "Greg M. Johnson"
<gregj:-)565### [at] aol com>
> wrote:
> > If I'm using spheres or torii in 0.7 and I have a question about the
> > syntax, should I post to p.u.-p.?
>
> Isn't syntax of box or torii already explained in documentation ? Are you
> asking about syntax or bug ? Chris Huff already pointed You that there is
> example file of object pattern - have You checked this ?
> http://users.skynet.be/smellenbergh/demopictures/obj_patternb.jpg
> http://users.skynet.be/smellenbergh/demopictures/obj_pattern.zip
>
> ABX
Post a reply to this message
|
|
