Slime <slm### [at] slimelandcom> wrote:
> So, DivX is just an implementation of MPEG? Is there any reason why it seems
> to do a better job than any of the other MPEG encodings I've seen before?
> Seems to produce fewer artifacts.

  You understand what's the difference between MPEG-1, MPEG-2 and MPEG-4?

-- 
#macro N(D)#if(D>99)cylinder{M()#local D=div(D,104);M().5,2pigment{rgb M()}}
N(D)#end#end#macro M()<mod(D,13)-6mod(div(D,13)8)-3,10>#end blob{
N(11117333955)N(4254934330)N(3900569407)N(7382340)N(3358)N(970)}//  - Warp -

Post a reply to this message