> There is nothing illegal here.  The docs clearly explain that the order
> dependencies have been removed in the 3.5 camera.  Any oder will yield
exactly
> the same effect.


Oooooh, I get it. So, even though you can specify them in any order, it
applies them in the correct order?

I was thinking, that since order no longer changed anything, it was illegal
to specify them in an order different from which they were applied.

Hmm... order no longer matters. Then you might want to change the error for
non-perpendicular camera vectors, which says that "making look_at the last
statement might help."

 - Slime
[ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]

Post a reply to this message