POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.general : Infinite object question : Re: Infinite object question Server Time
6 Aug 2024 16:59:46 EDT (-0400)
  Re: Infinite object question  
From: Patrick Dugan
Date: 3 Apr 2002 08:54:51
Message: <3cab09ab$1@news.povray.org>
After I thought about what you suggested I realized I misunderstood what you
meant.
I assumed you meant to replace the bounded_by with a clipped_by.  Of course
that removes the entire object.
I didn't try using a clipped_by (as opposed to a difference) on the HF.  (I
feel pretty stupid right now....)
However recreating the object via primitives didn't take that long.  Don't
know if it would be better memory/speedwise
to use the primtives or the HF but at this point it works so I'll probably
leave it alone.

Thank you for your suggestions.

Patrick Dugan

"Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message
news:3caaedd0$1@news.povray.org...
> Patrick Dugan <pat### [at] netinsnet> wrote:
> > I finally gave up.  I re-created the object using primitives and avoided
the
> > HF altogether.  The object is now finite
>
>   Why didn't you clip the object as I suggested? It would have made the
> object finite.
>   Well, do as you wish.
>
> --
> #macro M(A,N,D,L)plane{-z,-9pigment{mandel L*9translate N color_map{[0rgb
x]
> [1rgb 9]}scale<D,D*3D>*1e3}rotate y*A*8}#end M(-3<1.206434.28623>70,7)M(
> -1<.7438.1795>1,20)M(1<.77595.13699>30,20)M(3<.75923.07145>80,99)// -
Warp -


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.