"Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message
news:3c9faae1@news.povray.org...
>   No offence to the maker(s) of c42 and w42, but it really surprises me
> that someone could find them better than ta3 (it didn't get in my top 6,
> but IMHO it's much better than those other two).
>   I have no idea who the author of ta3 is, but I feel somewhat sorry for
> him/her. To get a score of 0 while those others got some points even
though
> ta3 clearly has more effort behind it.
>   It makes me wonder if someone voted for his/her own images (while the
> author of ta3 was honest)...
>

I don't think that happened (the former clause of your last sentence.)  You
mean *you've* never been offended by IRTC results?

There have been anims in IRTC for which I'd rather watch a minute of black
screen (some may prefer this over my work-- wait a minute, some have said my
work IS too much like a black screen!).

And then there's the idea of the graffiti outside on the wall of a modern
art museum.  For various reasons, some good some bad, from neurological to
philosophical, you'll probably get a few percent of visitors to the museum
saying they prefer the painted initials on the outside.

Post a reply to this message