Greg M. Johnson <gregj:-)565### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> c42        2   286      0.70          2        0.2
> ta3        0   497      0.00          0        0.0
> w42        1     6     16.67          1      277.8

  No offence to the maker(s) of c42 and w42, but it really surprises me
that someone could find them better than ta3 (it didn't get in my top 6,
but IMHO it's much better than those other two).
  I have no idea who the author of ta3 is, but I feel somewhat sorry for
him/her. To get a score of 0 while those others got some points even though
ta3 clearly has more effort behind it.
  It makes me wonder if someone voted for his/her own images (while the
author of ta3 was honest)...

-- 
#macro M(A,N,D,L)plane{-z,-9pigment{mandel L*9translate N color_map{[0rgb x]
[1rgb 9]}scale<D,D*3D>*1e3}rotate y*A*8}#end M(-3<1.206434.28623>70,7)M(
-1<.7438.1795>1,20)M(1<.77595.13699>30,20)M(3<.75923.07145>80,99)// - Warp -

Post a reply to this message