In article <3c6a935b@news.povray.org> , "Felix Wiemann" 
<Fel### [at] gmxnet> wrote:

> Why are the pixels at the edges sampled in a different way than the others
> with method 2 (but not method 1)?
> Why isn't the maximum number of samples taken?

Who cares as long as the result is free of errors?

If you want to know how AA works, take a look at the source code.  It is not
like everything has changed in 3.5 :-)

    Thorsten

Post a reply to this message