> My guess would be, that the 5 are the original ray, plus the four
> super-samples.  Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, though :)
>
> ...Chambers

I tried to express that :-) :

"Perhaps that is because a ray in the middle of the pixel is shooten,
but why shouldn't it be written in the documentation (or at least made
clear that these are *additional* samples)?"

As I said, IMO it would be good to make that clear in the doc.

Post a reply to this message