In article <1103_1012681210@selliot> , Patrick Elliott <selliot@rraz.com> 
wrote:

> This may be a completely stupid question... But couldn't it be set up so
> that the user
> can specify a precedence in cases where these things do happen? If the
> user could overide the automatic precedence sorting I would think the problem
> would disappear. It could be made to effect only the next object in a CSG
> or something,
> so that only those objects effected by it are overided.

It is a stupid question:  You are suggesting exactly the same I answered won't
work.  Try to read the explanation again...

    Thorsten

Post a reply to this message