"Zeger Knaepen" <zeg### [at] studentkuleuvenacbe> wrote in message
news:3c56ca96@news.povray.org...
> Now this is a reply that's helping me to understand why POV3.5 was made.  tnx
:)
> I didn't know the MegaPov code was like that.  I've never looked at POV-Ray's
source.
>

Ah! Now I understand your confusion. I (and presumably others) assumed you knew
this. Of course it's still your fault ;) - you should have said.

"IMHO, given the perfect code in use in MegaPov, the official POV team should
move on to v4.0 rather than re-inventing the wheel"....

Post a reply to this message