> Hmm, is this a valid arguement? 4.0 may be a rewrite, but I wouldn't imagine
> that that means throwing out everything that has proceeded it. More a question
> of implementing the algorithms in a different framework.
maybe, I don't know enough about C and C++.  Maybe they can just copy/paste most of
the
code, and in that case I can understand why they made POV3.5.

> Besides, what's there to complain about? Jam today and tomorrow suits me
> fine....
I'm not complaining, I'm just telling you what I think about POV3.5.  If you don't
like my
opinion: have your own one :)

cu!
--
camera{location-z*3}#macro G(b,e)b+(e-b)*(C/50)#end#macro L(b,e,k,l)#local C=0
;#while(C<50)sphere{G(b,e),.1pigment{rgb G(k,l)}finish{ambient 1}}#local C=C+1
;#end#end L(y-x,y,x,x+y)L(y,-x-y,x+y,y)L(-x-y,-y,y,y+z)L(-y,y,y+z,x+y)L(0,x+y,
<.5,1,.5>,x)L(0,x-y,<.5,1,.5>,x)               // ZK http://www.povplace.be.tf

Post a reply to this message