"Jaime Vives Piqueres" wrote in message news:3c27102f@news.povray.org...
> Your control over functions is simply amazing! I was also doing some
> decorative tests with functions, but more in my usual "muddling along"
way.
Thanks for your comments.
> Indeed, I was doing it with height_fields: a lot faster and almost the
same
> results for this kind of use.
Yes, height_fields are faster.
But they need hf data (i.e. larger memory) and less flexible.
c.f. http://news.povray.org/3c0467e3@news.povray.org
R. Suzuki
Post a reply to this message
|