POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.general : Particle / Physics system preprocessor requirements : Re: Particle / Physics system preprocessor requirements Server Time
7 Aug 2024 07:18:19 EDT (-0400)
  Re: Particle / Physics system preprocessor requirements  
From: John D  Gwinner
Date: 13 Dec 2001 14:58:08
Message: <3c190850$1@news.povray.org>
That's a good idea, with the //:P

I hereby stake claim!

I was originally thinking of the /* and */ comments, but using //:P is
better, as you can comment out an entire block by using /* and later */

                  == John ==

"s1631001" <s16### [at] namtarqubacuk> wrote in message
news:3C1### [at] namtarqubacuk...
> When commenting my files, I often use different "types" of comment
>
> //  this is a general comment
>
> //@---new section---
>
> //@@---new sub-section---
>
> //@@@---new sub-sub-section---
>
> //#  instructions (how to use macro, etc)
>
> //_  this comment applies to all lines from here...
>
> //^  ...to here
>
> //!  this is really important!
>
> //$  this tells me I haven't finished this portion of code yet.
>
> //?  this piece of code does strange things, but I don't know why!
>
> Perhaps you could use something like this? Let's use "//:x" as a comment
> tag for some program denoted "x". Eg, a particle system could read
> "//:P" tags, so...
>
> //:P  mass(1.0)
>
> --
> signature{
>   "Grey Knight"
>   contact{ email "gre### [at] yahoocom" }
>   site_of_week{ url "http://enphilistor.users4.50megs.com/" }
> }


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.