|
|
"Christoph Hormann" <chr### [at] gmxde> wrote in message
news:3C121BA2.C9A8D9B4@gmx.de...
> It looks quite good, but i would really like to see a closer look, at this
> size it's really difficult to judge the details.
Thanks. Well the idea was that it wouldn't be seen too close up as I don't
think the method involved would stand up to close scrutiny. I'm still
playing with the parameters and it's looking a lot better, especially now
that I removed the no_shadow (thanks Bob), and I've remembered to turn AA
on, that's something that was missing from this post. A replacement should
be posted in the next day or so.
Kev
Post a reply to this message
|
|