POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.beta-test : beta 8 images bug : Re: beta 8 images bug Server Time
2 Nov 2024 09:20:12 EDT (-0400)
  Re: beta 8 images bug  
From: bob h
Date: 7 Dec 2001 01:32:08
Message: <3c106268$1@news.povray.org>
Yep, it's known about.  Problem with functions.  Can read more on it from
earlier here.  At least this looks like the same type problem to me.
--
text{ttf"arial","bob h",.1,0pigment{rgb 9}translate<-1,-.2,3>}


<Pet### [at] nymaliasnetalmost> wrote in message
news:3c1024fa.10278981@localhost...
>         Just discovered what has to be a new bug in beta 8 of 3.5.
> It appears to be related to use of bitmap pigments in functions.
> To illustrate the effect, there is a short .pov script in
> povray.text.scene-files, posted under the subject "beta 8 image
> bug".
>         I'm running povray on Windows 2000 and on Windows ME with
> the bug manifesting on both platforms.
>         The first time I rendered the script, povray rendered fine.
> From this I conclude that I was using valid pov syntax.  I then
> attempted to render it again and this resulted in a crash with
> the following dialog test:
>
>
>   The instruction at 0x00436468" referenced memory at "0x00070007"
>   The memory could not be "read"
>   Click OK to terminate the program
>   Click CANCEL to debug the program
>
>         After crashing out, I immediately ran povray again and
> attempted to render again (this being the third try).  This
> time, parsing finished, and the picture began to render to the
> render window.  After one or two lines were rendered, povray
> stopped rendering with the message "Rendering Error: warp type 44
> not yet implemented.  Returning from renderer with error status".
>         Immediately trying to render again caused the crash as
> in the second attempt.
> Again, this happens on both Windows ME and Windows 2000.
>
> Can anyone run that .pov script and confirm?  Thank you.
>
>         In addition to the above, beta 8 appears to sporadically
> (randomly and not very often) crash on use of a image_map as an
> "old style" (not in a function) pigment.  I can't get this to
> repeat on demand so I did not post any code.  I only mention
> it because it might be related.
>
> Pete
>
>
>


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.