|
|
Try the below code. The rendering speed is about 5 times
faster than that of the original on my PC.
The gradient values near the origin is extremely smaller
than those near the container surface.
In such cases, it is better to calculate them separately.
The below code is not well optimized. Combination with other
techniques might increase the speed further.
c.f. http://news.povray.org/3bc417a4@news.povray.org
http://news.povray.org/3bd7f6e8$1@news.povray.org
R. Suzuki
-------------------------------------------------------------
#include "functions.inc"
background { color rgb <0.5, 0.7, 1> }
camera {
location <0.0, 2.0, -20.0>
look_at <0.0, 0.0, 1.0>
right x*image_width/image_height
}
light_source {
0*x
color rgb <1,1,1>
translate <0, 10, -20>
}
// create a isosurface object - the equipotential surface
// of a 3D math function f(x, y, z)
#declare fn_X = function(x,y,z,tau) {
8*(x^2-tau^4*y^2)*(y^2-tau^4*z^2)*(z^2-tau^4*x^2)
*(x^4+y^4+z^4-2*(x^2*y^2+y^2*z^2+z^2*x^2))
+(3+5*tau)*(x^2+y^2+z^2-1)^2*(x^2+y^2+z^2-(2-tau))^2 }
#macro ISO1(R1, R2, max_g, Open_flg)
isosurface {
function {fn_X(x,y,z,(1+sqrt(5))/2) & -f_sphere(x,y,z,R1)*max_g}
contained_by { sphere { 0, R2 } }
accuracy 0.001
max_gradient max_g
//evaluate 100, 1.20, 0.99
#if (Open_flg)
open
#end
}
#end
object{
union{
difference{
ISO1(2.49, 3.0, 3445031.481, on)
sphere{ 0, 2.5 }
}
ISO1(1.9, 2.5, 330000., on)
ISO1(1.4, 1.9, 13000., off)
ISO1(1.0, 1.4, 1500., off)
ISO1(0.72, 1.0, 70., off)
ISO1(0.6, 0.72, 5., off)
}
material {
texture {
pigment { color rgb <0.2, 0.7, 0.2> }
finish {
ambient 0.3 // ambient surface reflection color [0.1]
diffuse 0.6 // amount [0.6]
phong 0.5 // amount [0.0]
phong_size 40 // (1.0..250+) (dull->highly polished) [40]
reflection {
//0.0
1.0
fresnel on
falloff 1.0
exponent 1.0
metallic 1.0
}
}
}
}
rotate y*30
scale 3
}
Post a reply to this message
|
|