|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Lutz-Peter Hooge" <lpv### [at] gmx de> wrote in message
news:MPG.16673d50e53a86059896bd@news.povray.org...
> In article <3bfd19fe@news.povray.org>, ben### [at] catholic org says...
>
> > How exactly does that speed things up, Bob?
> I'm not sure extinction 0 increases speed, but adding no_shadow to the
> container object does. Unfornutately, athmospheric media doesn't have a
> container object...
My intent by suggesting that was you wouldn't need as much scattering or
density perhaps, thus reducing the sampling of media "particles" or pixels.
Thing is, I seem to recall there being a speed-up if the media is denser and
less able to be sampled deeper. I could be wrong.
Maybe you can get by with using a set 'intervals' value to prevent that from
going higher? Not sure if that goes for v3.5 beta.
Bob H.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |