3bcd1581@news.povray.org...
> I am no Rhino expert, but wouldnt this mesh problem be solved with a
smooth
> command ?
> That would add more triangles to the mesh but as i see the problem it
would
> help a lot.

It seems a good solution. It's also feasible with the free version of Amapi
but I'd loose the uv mapping information because Amapi 4 doesn't recognise
it. Would the uv info be kept after the smoothing in Rhino (I haven't used
Rhino since 1998) ? If it's the case it's worth trying.

G.

--

**********************
http://www.oyonale.com
**********************
- Graphic experiments
- POV-Ray and Poser computer images
- Posters

>
> Normally i would not recommend a product that costs US$ 975 (iirc) , but
> there's a free trial version with 25 saves. I think 25 it's enough for
> smoothing some poses and trying it in POV, ahn ?
>
> Will
>
> PS: The URL is www.rhino3d.com .
>
>
> "Gilles Tran" <tra### [at] inapginrafr> escreveu na mensagem
> news:3bcc5cfc$1@news.povray.org...

> > 3bcb7bf1@news.povray.org...
> > > Actually, I was going to suggest that you swap intervals and samples.
> You
> > > should also be able to make do with much less than 50. My candle uses
5.
> > No, it doesn't work in that case. Lowering the samples number just
creates
> > more visible and uglier artifacts. Increasing them (up to 200) doesn't
fix
> > the wireframe artifacts either, and just makes the render crawl.
> > It was just a test anyway. Temporary conclusion is that using this
> technique
> > with meshes has serious limitations but that it can be very valuable in
> > certain circumstances.
> >
> > G.
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > **********************
> > http://www.oyonale.com
> > **********************
> > - Graphic experiments
> > - POV-Ray and Poser computer images
> > - Posters
> >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

Post a reply to this message