|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Bill DeWitt" <bde### [at] cfl rr com> escreveu na mensagem
news:3bc8a07e$1@news.povray.org...
> Well, I wasn't talking about photo-realism. For instance, I have a
> continuing project of modeling a microscope. There are some internal gears
> that I had to dismantle the microscope to find. But I found them and
modeled
> them even though it will take a cutaway view to ever see them. Probably
> slows down the rendering a lot and certainly slowed down the project.
>
> But I can't see modeling something and leaving out the working parts.
> Probably a psychosis of some sort.
I see what you mean now, my blunder...
In answer to (what I think is) your real question, I model my scenes in a
way you can render them from any standpont and they would still make sense.
I don't use - to stay on your example - backdrop pictures and other
subterfuges made possible by povray, but not possible in real life.
Actually, I'd love to, but I am way to incompetent in the language to be
able to.Anyway, I'm not that uptight about it, though. Should you take a
cutaway at some of my models, you would fing flaws. My rule of thumb is: if
it will *never* be visible, don't model it; if there is the slightest
chance that someday it will be rendered in a way that it will be visible, go
ahead and do it.
Ruy
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |