POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : superellipsoidtest - failed? : Re: superellipsoidtest - failed? =part II= Server Time
20 Nov 2024 06:29:02 EST (-0500)
  Re: superellipsoidtest - failed? =part II=  
From: Slime
Date: 5 Oct 2001 00:10:45
Message: <3bbd32c5$1@news.povray.org>
It seems to me that POV-Ray 3.5 doesn't like numbers that small. That
confused me since I'm used to using numbers such as .00000001 to avoid
coincident surfaces. But I'm curious as to why it's so sensitive now. It
seems to round real small numbers down to zero or something.

--
- Slime
[ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]
[ http://www.slimeland.com/images/ ]
"marabou" <not### [at] availableyet> wrote in message
news:3bbcba8d@news.povray.org...
> marabou wrote:
>
> >
> > hello!
> >
> > i tested a little bit superellipsoids. with the following code i got a
> > funny pattern on it. does anybody know why?
> >
> > -------------------------
> > superellipsoid{
> >         <0.25,0.0001>
> >         pigment{Gray}
> >         scale 0.25
> >         rotate y*-20
> >         translate <0,0.5,0.5>
> > }
> >
> > -------------------------
>
> i forgot to say: if i take the following parameters the pattern is not
> there:
>
>  superellipsoid{
>         <0.25,0.001>


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.