POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.newusers : PovRay 3.1+ vs MegaPov : Re: PovRay 3.1+ vs MegaPov Server Time
4 Nov 2024 21:26:43 EST (-0500)
  Re: PovRay 3.1+ vs MegaPov  
From: dave
Date: 2 Oct 2001 14:28:12
Message: <3bba073c@news.povray.org>
Steve:
  What I ultimately want to do are some space scenes, which I know I need to get a
lens flare for..

And I want to maek a temple that has the stoneish look of stonhenge, with fog
and the like.. 

As well, I want grass (found inc's for that) and such.. No animation for this scene,
but I would for others.  I'm having problems make the Stone look.. 

Is there anything in megapov that does this?

Dave

Steve <ste### [at] zeroppsuklinuxnet> wrote:
> On 2 Oct 2001 13:42:02 -0400, dav### [at] intrepidvoygrcom wrote:
>>Got a quick question for you all.. 
>>I've had Pov 3.1 for a few months now.  Learning it all by experince.. 
>>
>>Done some water (not EXTREMLY pleased) and I've done some other stuff
>>using basic shapes.. like the torus and such.
>>
>>My question is, should I invest the time to go to MegaPov and have Pov as a backup
plan?

> If there's something in MegaPOV that you need like IsoSurfaces then do it, 
> but otherwise stick with 3.1.  

> The two can work side by side without any problems so you'll still have 3.1 even
> if you install MegaPOV.  3.1 is slightly faster aswell (according to my own tests
> here on this Linux box). 

> --
> Cheers
> Steve              email mailto:ste### [at] zeroppsuklinuxnet

> %HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee  0 pps. 

> web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/

> or  http://start.at/zero-pps

>   6:57pm  up 21 days, 21:13,  1 user,  load average: 1.03, 1.05, 1.01


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.