"Bill DeWitt" <bde### [at] cflrrcom> wrote in message
news:3ba208cf$1@news.povray.org...
>
>     Aren't some of these true? The conditional directives were "new" in 3.0
> weren't they? Perhaps some of these sections can be seen as history.
>

Hence the original suggestion that the tense be changed, rather than the
wording. Try and keep up, Bill ;)

Post a reply to this message