|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
I tried the P4 optimization with my P4 1.4 ghz and it gave some really weird
results on skyvase.pov. Did that happen to anyone else? The P3 optimized
version worked fine.
"Tilly" <web### [at] tabsnet de> wrote in message
news:3b8e8393$1@news.povray.org...
> Hello,
>
> there is a new (second), unofficial Version of POVRAY at
> http://students.washington.edu/sschmitt/pov/ for download. This Version is
> optimized (with support from Intel) for PIII/Athlon and P4. And I'm deeply
> impressed how immense the difference of rendertime between the
non-optimized
> and the optimized code is.
>
> I use the POVRAY-File chess2.pov to compare CPU's at
http://www.tabsnet.com/
> since the Beginning of 2000. I hope, someone of you send me an Result of
an
> P4 running the new, optimized POVRAY-Version.
>
> Here are some results of my Computer.
> Rendertime in second with this Parameter :
> -d -q9 +w800 +h600 +b1000 +r3 +a0.300 +v1 +ft -ichess2.pov
>
> Non-optimized 1'st optim. 2'nd optim.
> Athlon 1200 MHz 542 sec. 436 sec. 300 sec.
> Pentium III 667 MHz 1056 sec. ---- 689 sec.
>
> Tilly
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |