|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Christoph Hormann" wrote:
> i think i already mentioned these categories seem rather
> bad chosen to me, nothing really fits. (at least for me :-))
I agree. There's lots of the really skilled POV-Ray artists who have never
even participated in the IRTC and who will thus have to settle for
"Dabbler".
One way would be to use categories like art type / realism type / math type
/ science type / architecture type / path writer type / etc., but that will
collide partly with the styles/themes, and besides, some people might be in
more than one category.
For it really to make sense you'd have to use a linear scale (so you can
only be in one category), so I agree that 'beginner'-'medium'-'advanced' is
good.
BTW, I notice the site is in the POV-Ray NewRing and the POV-Ray Ring Japan,
but why not be included in the original POV-Ray Webring too (which is also
far bigger)? Unless of course you refuse because it's run by Yahoo!...
Rune
--
3D images and anims, include files, tutorials and more:
Rune's World: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated June 26)
POV-Ray Users: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk/povrayusers/
POV-Ray Webring: http://webring.povray.co.uk
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |