|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Francois Labreque" <fla### [at] videotron ca> wrote in message
news:3B7DCB3E.D9D4B910@videotron.ca...
> I know it's Waaaaaay too late for inclusion in 3.5, but this might be
> food for thought for 4.0 (or 3.6)
>
> Instead of having the camera right:up vector ratio default to 4:3 and
> providing image_height and image_width built-in variables so that we can
> adjust the value of the vectors to match the image aspect ratio, why not
> have it default to image_width:image_heigth?
>
> [Not part of the TAG, nor the POV-Team, but I happen to have a few very
> good ideas of what's going to be in 3.5]
Well, sometimes (when making heightfields) I change the image dimensions to
increase the detail in a certain direction, or because I don't need that
high resolution. Having these changes affect the camera would mean that I
would _have_ to use the same aspect ratio for my images (ie, I couldn't go
from 100x500 to 100x1000 without changing the whole scene).
...Chambers
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |