"Ken" <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote in message
news:3B1B970D.DFFF72F1@pacbell.net...
>
>
> Scott Hill wrote:
>
> >     I just think that 'a USA location' has been chosen merely for the
fact
> > that the people that suggested having a convention happen to live in
> > America...
>
> There was a UK convention a couple of years ago

    There was ? Wish I'd known about it at the time (or maybe I did and it
just slipped through the gaps in my memory)...

> and I don't recall anyone
> suggesting an alternate location at that time. Why should Americans act
> any differently ?
>

    Er, no reason, but why should the past affect what's done in the future
?

    Actually, I was mostly throwing the suggestion into the pot to see if it
would float or sink - it just seemed to me that, if we were to have one
single convention, somewhere neutral would be better.

--
Scott Hill.
Software Engineer.
E-Mail        : sco### [at] innocentcom
Pandora's Box : http://www.pandora-software.com

*Everything in this message/post is purely IMHO and no-one-else's*

Post a reply to this message