"Geoff Wedig" <wed### [at] darwinepbicwruedu> wrote in message
news:3ad358a2@news.povray.org...
>
> This would be nice, but I'd rather see it from the picture end, ie, min,
> max, mean and variance of the votes for each pic for each category.  That
> would give some idea of which pictures were contentious for what things,
or
> if many people voted a picture high except for a few low scores, or
> whatever.  Interesting information to the artist, certainly, and possibly
> useful for the IRTC after a couple of cycles.
>
> I'm not certain I'd want to know who took the time to vote, much less what
> kind of scores they gave out.  Voting should be somewhat private.
>

This is what I meant - I considered the idea of listing the individual votes
(and voters), but like you felt that it would be an intrusion.

Post a reply to this message