I am saying they probably 'will' work. But why waste the extra CPU cycles to
use iso's when perturbed normals are likely just as effective?
(Given the size of the microfacets). I really can't say about the photons
though. Like you, I haven't really studied them yet. :)


bat### [at] cadronhsacom


Nekar Xenos wrote in message <3abaec19@news.povray.org>...
>
>"Batronyx" <bat### [at] cadronhsacom> wrote in message
. . .and iso's and photons, while not hurting anything, might be
>> overkill.
>
>If a surface is perfectly smooth it would be reflective so radiosity
>shoulkdn't have any effect anyway. Why wouldn't isosurfaces and photons
>work?  I haven't studied them yet, but I'm very keen to(so little time and
>so much to do)...
>
>Nekar
>
>

Post a reply to this message