"Tom Melly" <tom### [at] tomandlucouk> wrote in message
news:3aa51d0a$1@news.povray.org...
> "Scott Hill" <sco### [at] ncgraphicsnet> wrote in message
> news:3aa51b6b@news.povray.org...
> >
> >     Ok then, does an image showing an evil act necissarily 'glorify'
that
> > act ?
> >
>
> Well, the example given was:
>
> "There was one where the woman was naked in a jail cell, the implication
> being that she was kept around for repeated rape: yes, an evil image."
>
> Not really enough information there about the context of the image -
however
> I would suggest that if such an image was meant to titilate and arouse
then,
> yes, it would be glorifying the act.
>


    Agreed and I was more playing Devils Advocate then anything else, but
Greg's post appeared to imply that the mere presence of a naked women (and
the rape implication) was enough to turn an image into a tool of evil - I
just wanted to point out that this is a slightly naive view.

--
Scott Hill

Post a reply to this message